On 2009-12-22, at 04:57, John C Klensin wrote: > Let me say this a little more strongly. This proposal > effectively modifies RFC 5321 for one particular domain name at > the same time that it effectively (see notes by others) > advocates against coding the relevant domain name into anything > or treating it in a special way. That combination doesn't seem > to me to work.
If that's the consensus of SMTP experts, then I would be more than happy to rip that example out (or the whole section, to be honest). I was quite enthusiastic about the previous revision's conscious decision not to include examples at all. Incidentally, the "other stories" remark in the subject line was a reference to the fact that the document instantiates a registry which can be used by others to document particular characteristics of records in the ARPA zone. It wasn't intended to refer to the examples section (which, as I mentioned, was added only recently). Joe _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
