Hi See inline below
/Ingemar > -----Original Message----- > From: Mans Nilsson [mailto:mansa...@besserwisser.org] > Sent: den 21 januari 2010 01:03 > To: Ingemar Johansson S > Cc: co...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) > > Subject: RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) > Date: Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:09:18PM +0100 Quoting Ingemar > Johansson S (ingemar.s.johans...@ericsson.com): > > > > So our interpretation of such proposed phased approach is > that the WG > > would be explicitely taking a decision to pursue the work > if there are > > no standardized codecs out there fullfilling the requirements. > > My interpretation of the situation is that this milestone is > in most peoples rear-view mirror. The available codecs that > could be rubberstamped are all missing some of the desirable > qualities, ie internetability, licensing, sound quality, latency. I would say that it is up to other SDOs to determine that once the requirements are set. The big problem is that technical and legal matters are aired in the same sentence and I beleive that even a Codec WG in IETF will in the end realize that the legal matters are the most complicated. But enough said about this. > > -- > Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina > MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 > I feel partially hydrogenated! > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
