On 13.03.2010 15:51, Cullen Jennings wrote:
I just got abused by someone reading the IESG web pages and pointing out dates like 2010-01-02 , are confusing. Is there a better way to do dates that we should be using on the ietf.org web pages?
A better way than the ISO format? I don't think so. Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
