On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:59, MtFBwU <may.4th...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am an average Internet user from China. Sorry for my bad English.
Actually, it seems fairly good to me. Anybody who can understand, let alone come up with, a username like yours, obviously has a pretty good grasp of it. :-) > In my opinion, theoretically, we *can* make the Internet uncensorable, In the large, it already essentially is. Find one tiny little pinhole, through which to leak something to somewhere free, and it cannot be erased from the net as a whole. (Note that said pinhole need not be via the net! Leak it on paper in a bottle, and someone might find it and post it to the net.) Anything from reports of power-embarassing events, to the old goatse pix, are still available SOMEwhere. > The TL;DR answer is FEC algorithms. Hmmm, interesting. I'm not an info-theory wonk, but at first blush, late on a Friday evening, this sounds plausible, to me. As Stephane points out, some of it is already popular. It sounds like you want to combine the diverse routing of BitTorrent (and ToR?), with some steganography ("debris nobody will notice", possibly in non-user data), and FEC to account for the possibility of some data being blocked or altered. What "prior art" research have you done? What did you find, and why wasn't it suitable? What do you see as the already available building blocks, or concepts to extend? -Dave -- Dave Aronson - Have Pun, Will Babble | Work: davearonson.com | /\ ASCII -------------------------------------+ Play: davearonson.net | \/ Ribbon "Specialization is for insects." | Life: dare2xl.com | /\ Campaign -Robert A. Heinlein | Wife: nasjleti.net | Email<>Web _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf