Ben wrote: > > I was not under the impression from reading rate-control that that document > > was modifying 3265 to prevent notifiers from sending an empty notify. But, > > your suggestion is a reasonable one. Reading the rate-control text you > > quoted earlier in the thread could lead to the impression that this is the > > case. I've added the rate control authors to the thread. > >
> I don't think it modifies 3265 in general, but it does seem to normatively > prevent empty NOTIFY requests as a result of a max-interval expiration. Agreed. Some clarification on this point would be useful. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
