On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote:

> The corporate name on my nametag is there only because I filled that field
> in the registration form. Others haven't and don't have a corporation name.
>
> Besides, the corporation name is there not because Check Point has "bought"
> the IETF, but so that if I say that everyone should use a firewall, people
> will take that with the appropriate grain of salt.
>

Affiliations are normally listed on IETF documents and badges for the
purpose of assisting in identifying the person so affiliated.

Donald


> Anyway, if we're raising money for the IETF, someone should have made IETF
> 77 T-shirts for sale. They last longer than green dots, and give you
> bragging rights.
>
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:12 PM, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) wrote:
>
> > Guess you are not that street smart, look at the corporation names on
> > the name tags... IETF is bought....
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Dave CROCKER
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:19 PM
> > To: Thomson, Martin
> > Cc: IETF Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/22/2010 5:59 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
> >> "This working group brought to you by<Dave Crocker>"
> >>
> >> Just after note well.
> >
> >
> > Right, but some working groups will have multiple offers for
> > sponsorship.
> >
> > Should there be a premium charge for the more popular working groups?
> >
> > There also might be some spoofing, where someone pays to have /you/
> > listed as
> > sponsor of the wg.  That leads to the possibility of your paying for a
> > de-listing...
> >
> > d/
> > --
> >
> >   Dave Crocker
> >   Brandenburg InternetWorking
> >   bbiw.net
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to