On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
> The corporate name on my nametag is there only because I filled that field > in the registration form. Others haven't and don't have a corporation name. > > Besides, the corporation name is there not because Check Point has "bought" > the IETF, but so that if I say that everyone should use a firewall, people > will take that with the appropriate grain of salt. > Affiliations are normally listed on IETF documents and badges for the purpose of assisting in identifying the person so affiliated. Donald > Anyway, if we're raising money for the IETF, someone should have made IETF > 77 T-shirts for sale. They last longer than green dots, and give you > bragging rights. > > On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:12 PM, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) wrote: > > > Guess you are not that street smart, look at the corporation names on > > the name tags... IETF is bought.... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > Dave CROCKER > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:19 PM > > To: Thomson, Martin > > Cc: IETF Discussion > > Subject: Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77 > > > > > > > > On 3/22/2010 5:59 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote: > >> "This working group brought to you by<Dave Crocker>" > >> > >> Just after note well. > > > > > > Right, but some working groups will have multiple offers for > > sponsorship. > > > > Should there be a premium charge for the more popular working groups? > > > > There also might be some spoofing, where someone pays to have /you/ > > listed as > > sponsor of the wg. That leads to the possibility of your paying for a > > de-listing... > > > > d/ > > -- > > > > Dave Crocker > > Brandenburg InternetWorking > > bbiw.net >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf