I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a significant step backward. I would object to chartering the group with that paragraph added without explicitly listing any use cases including the onse I brought up that have come forward in this discussion. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep) Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 ... Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2... Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after I... Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep aft... Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringpre... Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Strin... Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: S... Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: S... Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: S... Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: S... Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: S... Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringpre... Mark Lentczner
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Strin... Alexey Melnikov