I can not see why this draft is needed other than making MITM attacks easier. I request that this not proceed until we can figure out what is going to happen to draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch then decide if these changes to MSRP are needed or if the existing mechanism are sufficient.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:39 AM, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from the SIP for Instant Messaging and > Presence Leveraging Extensions WG (simple) to consider the following document: > > - 'An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol > (MSRP) ' > <draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-06-21. Exceptionally, > comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm-09.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18161&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > Simple mailing list > sim...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
