> From: Ross Callon <rcal...@juniper.net>

    >> And even closer to 3:2:2 ?

    > I also feel that 3:2:2 is about the right ratio.

Well, 5:3:3 (a ratio of .833, NA/others) is even closer to the 1.7:1:1 (.850)
of the data than 3:2:2 (.750, off by .100). (2:1:1 of course gives 1.0, a
variance of .150 from the .850 ratio of the data.)

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to