* Noel Chiappa: > I actually vaguely recall discussions about the TOS field (including > how many bits to give to each sub-field), but I can't recall very > much of the content of the discussions. If anyone cares, some of the > IENs which document the early meetings might say more.
See RFC 760, which seems remarkably up-to-date: A few networks offer a Stream service, whereby one can achieve a smoother service at some cost. Admittedly, this sentence did not make it into RFC 791. (Except that my guess what network non-neutrality is really about is quite different: usage caps exceptions for content where the content hoster and the ISP have reached an ad-sharing deal. QoS rarely works in practice because no two organizations or departments can agree on a common set of parameters.) -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf