* Noel Chiappa:
> I actually vaguely recall discussions about the TOS field (including
> how many bits to give to each sub-field), but I can't recall very
> much of the content of the discussions. If anyone cares, some of the
> IENs which document the early meetings might say more.
See RFC 760, which seems remarkably up-to-date:
A few networks offer a Stream service, whereby one can achieve a
smoother service at some cost.
Admittedly, this sentence did not make it into RFC 791.
(Except that my guess what network non-neutrality is really about is
quite different: usage caps exceptions for content where the content
hoster and the ISP have reached an ad-sharing deal. QoS rarely works
in practice because no two organizations or departments can agree on a
common set of parameters.)
--
Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
