I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2010-10-25 IETF LC End Date: 2010-11-10 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. In section 2 why not reference RFC 2119 or at least copy the definition from RFC 2119 for the capitalized term. 2. In section 3.9 when you say "if this technique is used", by this do you mean certificate -less or the flow defined in the previous sentence. 3. In section 4.6.3 the first paragraph defines the requirements for Cryptographic Binding. It looks to me like the rest of the section talks about a specific use case, so why is it in the requirements section and not in section 3. Nits/editorial comments:
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf