>>>>> "Eliot" == Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> writes: >> The downside of Russ's draft is that it is possible that after >> approving it we might find that nothing changes: Protocol >> specifications still stay at Proposed Standard; The IESG still >> takes a lot of time in approving a request to publish a proposed >> standard RFC.
Eliot> How will we measure effect? And what other factors need to Eliot> be controlled? The obvious measure of number of IDs->PS is interesting. But, perhaps the average length of time for ID-00 -> PS is more important, overall to the entire discussion. That number needs to additionally have a time point of WG LC, move to IESG and also IETF LC. -- ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] m...@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> then sign the petition. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf