On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Yoav Nir <y...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
> We can have as high a barrier as necessary to ensure there are no more > than, say, 12 posters. That means someone has to judge them and that takes time. > On Jan 11, 2011, at 3:39 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > > > +1. Very strongly. > > > > Whether the logistics of space and times could be worked out or > > not, poster sessions strike me as a really bad idea and Fred has > > summarized at least most of the reasons. If we had a high > > barrier to posting I-Ds, it might be different. But we don't. > > > > john > +1 The problem that this is attempting to get round is the low barrier to publication of IDs which means that there are many of them and ideas get lost. That is not a problem that can be solved by introducing another low barrier to publication venue. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
