On Jan 30, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:27:17AM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >> The raising of the bar for proposed standard has a very simple reason: it is >> now almost impossible to change specifications once deployed. > > That's an argument for _no_ maturity levels, then, not for two.
Is there an implicit assumption here that more standards (presumably of poorer quality) is a good thing? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
