----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> To: "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com> Cc: "Cullen Jennings" <flu...@cisco.com>; "IESG IESG" <i...@ietf.org>; "IETF discussion list" <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:01 PM
> On 2/1/11 2:14 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > > Cullen Jennings skrev 2011-01-31 18:44: > >> <snip>. > > Some people say "it doesn't appear that the actual level of security > provided is different if you are forced to use one port or two" and > others disagree. This did get a thorough airing on the TLS list in the second week of November "[TLS] Security concerns around co-locating TLS and non-secure on same port (WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08)" As Paul said, some say yea and others nay. Tom Petch > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
