>> Can the RFC Production Center remind us about what the actual numbers
>> are, and also whether they ever generate an XML version if the authors
>> didn't supply one?


Julian's numbers are good approximations; 50-60% of docs have XML source files. 
 

The Production Center does not create XML files.  We process XML files when XML 
source files are provided to us.  

Thanks,
Sandy
for the RFC Production Center


> From: Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
> Date: February 23, 2011 5:09:54 AM EST
> To: Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>
> Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net, IAOC <i...@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
> Subject: RFC production center XML format usage, was: [IAOC] xml2rfc and 
> legal services RFPs
> 
> On 23.02.2011 10:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 22.02.2011 17:18, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> There are many tools used by I-D
>>>>> authors, including nroff/troff/groff, NroffEdit, MS Word templates,
>>>>> LaTex,
>>>>> and a plethora of editors. The IETF cannot take on every tool that
>>>>> seems
>>>>> popular.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Isn't the statistic of xml2rfc use somewhere around 50-60%?
>>> 
>>> Roughly half. Again, that is why there is a value to the RFC
>>> Production Center.
>>> ...
>> 
>> Can the RFC Production Center remind us about what the actual numbers
>> are, and also whether they ever generate an XML version if the authors
>> didn't supply one?
>> ...
> 
> I just realized that I have an archive of XML versions of RFCs in AUTH48 
> state; so I *can* report the percentage of XML versions since ~RFC5000.
> 
> Note that these may be inaccurate (for instance, not all RFC numbers get 
> assigned, right?); it just observes how much XML files ended up in AUTH48.
> 
> Here are the numbers:
> 
> RFC5000 - RFC5099: 41
> RFC5100 - RFC5199: 44
> RFC5200 - RFC5299: 47
> RFC5300 - RFC5399: 48
> RFC5400 - RFC5499: 64
> RFC5500 - RFC5599: 59
> RFC5600 - RFC5699: 58
> RFC5700 - RFC5799: 64
> RFC5800 - RFC5899: 63
> RFC5900 - RFC5999: 68
> RFC6000 - RFC6099: 69
> 
> Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to