On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, James M. Polk <jmp...@cisco.com> wrote:
Brian > > playing devil's advocate here... > > Say someone submits a request for an existing DS to the IESG and it takes 6 > months (or 3 months) to get through the process, but only 2 months remain > before the 2 year window is up (since this RFC was published). Does that > grandfather the DS into "the process" - meaning that document is no longer > subject to this 'within 2 year notice' rule? > > I'm just saying that this appears to beg all DS editors to get their DS > notifications into the IESG sooner rather than later, which is fine, but > that also creates a heck of a workload on the IESG that they currently do > not have, does it not? > > Something is going to be impacted. Make it a 2 year deadline for receiving requests. Problem solved. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
