> What I'm opposed to, and what prompted my note, was purely what I > consider a misguided effort to turn the xml2rfc model from generic > markup into a formatting language.
For the record, I entirely agree. The reason I've proposed adding formatting twiddles to xml2rfc is so that the RFC Ed can use the same tools as everyone else. The idea to put the twiddlage into a different namespace so we can discourage I-D authors from using it is a reasonable one. R's, John PS: One of the reasons nroff is so dead is that it's nearly impossible to avoid coding format twiddles into your documents. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
