On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi, > It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) > encounters > so many new hurdles: > > 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even > though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the > expiration > message in html format as the new version to be submitted. > > Is there a way to get around this?
Don't let I-Ds expire? > > 2. RFC XML has changed. It seem like > xml.resource.org has a new xml compiler. I had a lot of trouble in compiling > my > existing xml files. Hmm. I'm not experiencing any problems, either with the on-line or the host based tools. Are you sure that your XML was valid before? > I am OK with improving RFC XML but why not keep upward > compatibility? > > Regards, > > Behcet > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > >
<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
