On May 16, 2011 11:41 PM, <sth...@nethelp.no> wrote: > > > > How much longer does this list need to be to justify choosing better labels for this v6 dual-stack transition hack? > > > > returning different sets of resource records on the basis of the orgin of a query ala split horizon is not exactly new ground. > > > > By my observation, what is being done, satisfactorily > > meets the dictionary definition of a whitelist. the term was uncontroversial in the dicussion leading up to the wglc. If it's really inapropiate that's cool but I'm frankly not convinced. > > Agreed. I see no good reason to change the use of "whitelist". Let's > move on. >
+1 for moving on Cb > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
