On May 30, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > But you've contributed to this document, so have others from that list. > > I don't want to contribute to the document because - in my opinion, and > speaking only for myself - I don't think it can be made into a balanced > assessment of the issue without major changes.
I do things that the ietf says are a bad idea all the time, I take the concerns expressed in informational documents that I've read under-advisement when I do so. > Since a) I don't have even a fraction of the time I would need to actually > contribute said changes, b) the document is already in an advanced state of > the IETF process, and c) it doesn't matter so much what the document ends up > saying, because most of the organizations for whom this is an issue have > already looked at the data and recognized that they have no alternative, I > was simply steering clear of the document entirely. > > It's true that I have pointed out things I think are incorrect. But I did not > view these as contributions, more as offering occasional token opposition > lest silence be interpreted as assent. :-) But perhaps you're right and I > should not comment on it at all. > > Cheers, > Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
