The discussion make it clear to me that the tasks for IANA are not clear. It seems that there needs to be a table for each supported version of Unicode. Thats document should state that clearly. It is a point where RFC 5892 seems to be vague, and we should take this opportunity to remove the ambiguity.
This document or a future one needs to answer the following question: Who is responsible for generating a new table when the next version of Unicode comes out? Russ On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:32 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > (ii) The relevant ADs consider whether a document clarifying the > registry content and/or identification information is needed and > consult with IANA on that topic as appropriate. If the answer > is "yes", let's get that document posted and start debating what > changes, if any, should be made using it as a foundation (rather > than finding new weeds to drag 5892bis into). _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
