> Cameron Byrne wrote: > The faint promise of yet another transition mechanism is hardly > a motivation to keep 6to4 around. The data (ripe ...) > overwhelming proves default-on 6to4 clients + thinly deployed > relays = unreliable ipv6 and ipv6 deployment obstacle.
That's the difference between a fait promise and a proven failure. The promise of "IPv6 native IPv6 is going to be deployed next year" has failed for 10+ years in a row. Nobody believes in it anymore; your choices are to believe in yet another transition mechanism or switch to the post-mortem camp. Get a life. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
