On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 04:49:47 PM Martin Rex wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote: > > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > > I was however willing to accept "historic" as a reasonable > > > > compromise. > > > > > > "historic" as a compromise? Between which two positions? > > > > Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor? > > Which to options that are actually available to the IESG? I see > > extremist-A: nuke/kill 6to4 by moving 3056/3068 to historic > > compromise: move 3056/3068 off Standards Track, > i.e. by reclassifying them as Experimental > > blocked: leave 3056/3068 at Proposed, publish only 6to4-advisory > > extremist-B: stick fingers in ears, sing la-la-la, pretend 6to4 is perfect
I think I've read this entire thread and I don't recall anyone advocating extremist-B. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
