In message <b2c17b21-ea8a-4698-8c41-f55a9aa14...@gbiv.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" writes: > On Jul 21, 2011, at 10:52 AM, I=F1aki Baz Castillo wrote: > > > 2011/7/21 Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net>: > >> It's proven impossible, despite effort, to retrofit SRV onto HTTP; there= > is > >> no way it'll be possible to retrofit onto WS. > > = > > > Right. If WS borns with no SRV (as a MUST for WS clients) then just > > forget it and let inherit all the ugly limitations from HTTP protocol. > > I am tired of this. SRV is not used for HTTP because SRV adds latency > to the initial request for no useful purpose whatsoever.
How do you solve the problem of hosting just "http://example.com/"; on "s1.joes-web-service.com" and not redirect everything else at example.com? People have been complaining about this for about as long as the web has existed. > SRV records for > XMPP and MX records for mail are useful because there is only one such > server expected per domain and it is *very* desirable to maintain central > control over that routing. In contrast, HTTP is deployed in an anarchic > manner in which there are often several HTTP servers per machine > (e.g., tests, staging, production, CUPS, etc,). AFAICT, WebSockets is > even more anarchic than HTTP -- it will have to be, given that the sane > network admins will block it by default. > > In short, SRV is not used by the Web because it is inappropriate for HTTP. > I have seen no reason to believe that it would be appropriate for WebSocket= > s. > If you want SRV to be part of the proposed standard, then you have to convi= > nce > the people implementing WS to use SRV. None have done so, yet, so we can't > expect the editor to add it to the spec just because you have an opinion. > > ....Roy > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
