Hello,
I am not an expert in the questions of 6to4, but unless there are strong
arguments claiming that this technology is not used any more,
reclassification isn't appropriate. Discouraging implementation/use of
the protocol is not a purpose of Historic, it is to mark what already
no-one uses. It is only possible to determine when the obvious absence
of previous and current interest in the technology is determined by the
community, such as eg. SiFTP, RFC 913. I don't see such community's
vision on 6to4, and therefore the document may not progress further
unless strong community consensus is built.
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
25.07.2011 17:30, Ronald Bonica wrote:
Folks,
After some discussion, the IESG is attempting to determine whether there is
IETF consensus to do the following:
- add a new section to draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
- publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic as INFORMATIONAL
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will obsolete RFCs 3056 and 3068 and convert
their status to HISTORIC. It will also contain a new section describing what it
means for RFCs 3056 and 3068 to be classified as HISTORIC. The new section will
say that:
- 6-to-4 should not be configured by default on any implementation (hosts, cpe
routers, other)
- vendors will decide whether/when 6-to-4 will be removed from implementations.
Likewise, operators will decide whether/when 6-to-4 relays will be removed from
their networks. The status of RFCs 3056 and 3068 should not be interpreted as a
recommendation to remove 6-to-4 at any particular time.
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will not update RFC 2026. While it clarifies the
meaning of "HISTORIC" in this particular case, it does not set a precedent for
any future case.
Please post your views on this course of action by August 8, 2011.
Ron Bonica
<speaking as
OPS Area AD>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
