On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long term future *by >> definition*. Even if someone chooses to design a v2, who is going to >> implement it? > > Actually, I think one could argue pretty effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis.
+1 - Mark > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
