On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:55 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote: > On 31st July 2011, Brian Carpenter wrote, in part:
[snip] >> It might cause a change, simply because the effort of making the single >> move PS->IS will get you to the end state, whereas previously you had >> to make two efforts, PS->DS->STD. But only time will tell if this changes >> our collective behaviour. > > Making this process change definitely will change my attitude > towards trying to advance standards-track RFCs that I am directly > involved with. > > Until now, the process overhead to move from PS to STD was far too great > to justify the time spent. My perception is that this change reduces > the process work substantially -- and a change in perception (i.e. > "perception" by itself) is sufficient to increase my own motivation > to make the attempt. > > While perception normally varies widely between individuals, > on virtually all topics, I am not alone in in the view > I've expressed just above. > > Yours, > > Ran This is the intent. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
