On 3 Aug 2011, at 21:21, John Levine wrote: >>> happy to let those who prefer to not have such a prefix setup their >>> procmail rules to remove it.<-:) > > Gee, I was about to say I was happy for people who want a subject tag > to add one using procmail or whatever. > > I'm not unalterably opposed to subject tags, but I believe that the > IETF's dogfood is of the List-ID: flavor.
Yes. It follows the same construction, and rationale, of not messing around with the Reply-To: field, when enough information is available in list software-specific headers to build whatever user indications or reply functionality is required. But I do understand people's desire of these sorts of tags, and I know for a fact that many commonly-used UAs simply have neither the filtering nor display capabilities to resist them. So I would not oppose a general motion to make this change. It's one less nice thing about the ietf list, though. -1 +/- 0.25 Cheers, Sabahattin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
