+1
d/ -- Dave Crocker bbiw.net via mobile -----Original Message----- > I pretty much agree, although one form of discuss might be > reasonable: "This document needs to be recycled at Proposed > Standard because of the following *observed* interoperability > problem:...". > In other words, once we have got this BCP out (soon, please), > the IESG should update the DISCUSS criteria specifically to > narrow them for the PS->IS transit +1
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
