----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Nadeau" <tnad...@lucidvision.com> To: "Alia Atlas" <akat...@gmail.com> Cc: "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-i...@mit.edu>; "Dave CROCKER" <dcroc...@bbiw.net>; <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:39 PM On Aug 24, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Dave CROCKER <dcroc...@bbiw.net> wrote: > > > On 8/24/2011 1:27 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > Can you start by backing up the assertion that the community has > vigrously expressed a preference for interesting venues? > I may just need a new IETF community:-) > > > gosh, I hadn't thought that that was less than obvious, given the vote for quebec and many, many comments about venue choice over the years. > > I'm one who really liked Minneapolis - we had excellent meeting space, places to run into each other, reasonable food access, and a clueful hotel. > > Is it interesting to go to new places? Sure and if I'm lucky I might get a morning or afternoon to look around. Would I be perfectly happy going to the same 2-3 places every year? Absolutely.
I am with you on that. I do not attend IETFs as a vacation and sight-seeing opportunity. <tp> Yes, I too go to work, and would rate Minneapolis in the top three, with Atlanta perhaps just above it. Tom </tp> --Tom > > Alia > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
