On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > I support adding the SHOULD ... UNLESS formalism (although maybe it should be > MUST... UNLESS). It would be useful as there will be times where the UNLESS > can be specified and has been given due consideration at the time of writing. > That, however, will not always be the case. (More inline).
How would SHOULD...UNLESS or MUST...UNLESS differ from using the current 2119 definitions and just writing SHOULD...unless or MUST ... unless? Personally I think 2119 is just fine and doesn't need to be updated. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
