I think it is unfortunate that we are in a situation where such a document has utility. But ultimately it does.
Therefore I support the publication of draft-sprecher... D > MPLS Working Group, > > Please be aware of the IETF last call as shown below. The document was > presented for publication as an individual RFC with IETF consensus and > AD sponsorship. > > This draft is clearly close and relevant to the work you do, but after > discussing with the chairs I came to the conclusion that it does not > comment on the technical or process decisions of the MPLS working > groups, and it does not attempt to make any technical evaluations or > definitions within the scope of the MPLS working group. It is more of > a philosophical analysis of the way the IETF approaches the "two > solutions" problem with special reference to MPLS-TP OAM. > > Thus, I am accepting the document as AD Sponsored rather than running > it through the MPLS working group. My reasoning is that the working > group has got plenty to do working on technical issues without being > diverted into wider IETF philosophy. > > As an AD Sponsored I-D it is subject to a four week IETF last call. > That is plenty of opportunity for everyone to comment and express > their views. Please send your comments to the IETF mailing list as > described below, or (in exceptional circumstances) direct to the IESG. > > Thanks, > Adrian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf