I think it is unfortunate that we are in a situation where such a document has 
utility. But ultimately it does.

Therefore I support the publication of draft-sprecher...

D



> MPLS Working Group,
>
> Please be aware of the IETF last call as shown below. The document was 
> presented for publication as an individual RFC with IETF consensus and 
> AD sponsorship.
>
> This draft is clearly close and relevant to the work you do, but after 
> discussing with the chairs I came to the conclusion that it does not 
> comment on the technical or process decisions of the MPLS working 
> groups, and it does not attempt to make any technical evaluations or 
> definitions within the scope of the MPLS working group. It is more of 
> a philosophical analysis of the way the IETF approaches the "two 
> solutions" problem with special reference to MPLS-TP OAM.
>
> Thus, I am accepting the document as AD Sponsored rather than running 
> it through the MPLS working group. My reasoning is that the working 
> group has got plenty to do working on technical issues without being 
> diverted into wider IETF philosophy.
>
> As an AD Sponsored I-D it is subject to a four week IETF last call. 
> That is plenty of opportunity for everyone to comment and express 
> their views. Please send your comments to the IETF mailing list as 
> described below, or (in exceptional circumstances) direct to the IESG.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to