On 2011-10-20 08:41, George, Wes wrote: > I'm also completely mystified as to why IPv6 support for all > proposed/requested features is not an explicitly stated requirement, > even at this phase.
And more generally, this should be considered an opportunity for dogfooding the protocols we create. IPv6 is one of them. SIP, RTP, the XCON stuff, and XMPP could be others. It would be very sad if we end up with the usual everything-over-HTTP Flash applet stuff. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
