Mary; Would you want the comments that are currently sent in privately to nomcom to become public, or do you want the voters to make their choices without hearing these comments?
Ross From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:52 PM To: Peter Saint-Andre Cc: John C Klensin; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Requirement to go to meetings On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im<mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im>> wrote: On 10/26/11 1:47 PM, Fred Baker wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> (e.g., the NomCom >> schedule is defined in terms of three meetings a year). > > no problem. We stop having the nomcom. Sure, we just set up a (two-tier?) membership structure and have all the members vote. Easy. [MB] You don't need a membership structure to have voting - you just allow anyone that has attended the requisite number of meetings per the Nomcom process to vote - i.e., if you are qualified to be a voting member of the Nomcom, you can vote. I personally believe that voting would be better than the current model. As it is, a very small percentage of the participants actually contribute to the process in the form of nominating or providing feedback: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00 (section 6.2) So, making it easier to provide input in the form of a vote might actually get more folks caring about who the leaders are. It would also save a tremendous amount of work on the part of the folks that serve on the Nomcom. [/MB] [Also, ducking] Mary. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org<mailto:Ietf@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
