These were requested by one of the authors of the RFCs in question. We will gladly consider other requests.
Russ On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:45 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello, > > I'm in favor of moving these RFCs to Historic: > > RFC 1005 (ARPANET AHIP-E Host Access Protocol (enhanced AHIP)), > RFC 979 (PSN End-to-End functional specification), > RFC 878 (ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol) and all predecessors, > RFC 852 (ARPANET short blocking feature), > > and do not mind moving these, which are superseded by others, to Historic: > > RFC 1490 (Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay) and PS predecessor, > RFC 1293 (Inverse Address Resolution Protocol), > RFC 1619 (PPP over SONET/SDH). > > However, with respect to the first list: there are a great number of RFCs > which are also to be classified as Historic, and this list exceeds the > provided several times (at least look at RFC 1000, bullet 2). With respect > to the second list: there are a great number of other RFCs which have been > supersedes by others, and there are really a few which deserve not moving > them to Historic. > > Or this is the first round of clean-up only? > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
