In message <m2sjl644h3.wl%ra...@psg.com>, Randy Bush writes: > anyone who thinks this will not be used as 1918 space should share > what they are smoking. the question is not if, but rather how many > milliseconds before it is. that is the operational reality.
And what harm to others does that cause? If a ISP is using this and the customer is using this rather than RFC 1918 space then they only have themselves to blame for operational problems it causes. > and we should have a betting pool on how long before it is leaked > into a measure such as route-views. And users would be advised to filter routes for it the same as they should be filtering routes for other space they are using. > and all this is aside from the pnp, skype, ... and other breakage. > and, imiho, we can screw ipv4 life support. skype etc. will learn. This does prevent the breakage it just makes it more controlled. What's the bet Skype has a patched released within a week of this being made available? > this has become a contest of wills, not a technical discussion. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
