On 2011-12-06 22:06, Benson Schliesser wrote:
ISPs need to use addressing within this scope that does not cause (additional)
problems for their existing customers (and their customers' equipment). And in
the event of an addressing conflict, operators (on both sides) need a common
reference to determine who is at "fault" - i.e. who is responsible for fixing
the problem.
Are you suggesting that ISPs MUST use the proposed /10 for CGNs?
That's... interesting. Maybe it could empower customers when an ISP is using
something else (e.g. squat space) for its CGN and it's causing issues...
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
