<hat type='AD'/> On 1/2/12 12:36 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> While that was me who proposed the change to semantics, I tend more > and more to agree with documenting the existing practice; but let's > wait a response from W3C community first to see what's their attitude > towards the proposal. Mykyta, You have not yet submitted a revised I-D. Currently the document under consideration is draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00. If you want to make fundamental changes to the spec, please do so by submitting a revised I-D. In the meantime, I have deferred the document to the January 19 telechat while you decide how you want to proceed. If you decide that you want to define two link relations instead of one, you will need to submit a revised I-D, which will need to undergo another review on the link-relati...@ietf.org list and then another IETF Last Call. There is no need to waste IESG and general IETF attention on this specification if the author can't make up his mind about his own intentions. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
