Yes, fixed now. Mykyta
2012/1/4 Thomas Roessler <t...@w3.org>: > Thanks. > > In an editorial nit, the first example in 2.1 still uses the > "disclosure-list" relationship type. > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <t...@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > > > On 2012-01-04, at 07:29 +0100, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > >> So I've submitted the revised version, taking into account all the LC >> comments, and the consensus on defining W3C's current practice (as I >> see many comments received with this respect) rather than two separate >> relation types. A number of other edits have been made; you may see >> the diffs at >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-01 >> and the draft at >> tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-01. >> Meanwhile, as the document is deferred to next IESG telechat, you may >> freely submit your comments on this version, either publicly or >> privately to the author. >> >> Mykyta Yevstifeyev >> >> 2012/1/4 Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>: >>> <hat type='AD'/> >>> >>> On 1/2/12 12:36 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >>> >>>> While that was me who proposed the change to semantics, I tend more >>>> and more to agree with documenting the existing practice; but let's >>>> wait a response from W3C community first to see what's their attitude >>>> towards the proposal. >>> >>> Mykyta, >>> >>> You have not yet submitted a revised I-D. Currently the document under >>> consideration is draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00. If you want >>> to make fundamental changes to the spec, please do so by submitting a >>> revised I-D. >>> >>> In the meantime, I have deferred the document to the January 19 telechat >>> while you decide how you want to proceed. >>> >>> If you decide that you want to define two link relations instead of one, >>> you will need to submit a revised I-D, which will need to undergo >>> another review on the link-relati...@ietf.org list and then another IETF >>> Last Call. >>> >>> There is no need to waste IESG and general IETF attention on this >>> specification if the author can't make up his mind about his own intentions. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> -- >>> Peter Saint-Andre >>> https://stpeter.im/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf