Hi - > From: "Michael Richardson" <m...@sandelman.ca> > To: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hal...@gmail.com> > Cc: "IETF Discussion Mailing List" <ietf@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:13 AM > Subject: Re: ITC copped out on UTC again ... > Can you tell me which protocols use future timestamps in an moving form > (not stored at rest in a certificate in a DANE RR, for instance), which > care about discrepancies of less than 1 minute?
The disman Scheduling MIB (RFC 3231) has future timestamps. They are defined as dates / times, with provision for how discontinuities in civil time (whether due to "summer time", time zone changes, or leap seconds) are to be handled. This definition makes it unlikely that a sane developer would internally represent them as computed intervals. Leap second handling is a big non-issue in SNMP-land, as far as I know. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
