not replying specific to this mail but to the tons that have arrived
lately, are there some confusion out there that it is the amount of
"votes" on ietf@ that make a do/do not on a draft? ... or just me
missunderstanding this?


anyway, great to see people participate :-)

--- Roger J ---

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Erichsen, Kirk
<kirk.erich...@twcable.com> wrote:
> I fully support this draft and would like to see it progress to conclusion 
> without further delay.
>
> With warm regard,
>
> Kirk Erichsen
> Principle Technology Engineer
> Time Warner Cable
> ATG West
>
>
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail 
> and any printout.
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rog...@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | ro...@jorgensen.no
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to