On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:05 AM, SM wrote: > At 09:50 01-03-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Stephen and I just had a chat about this matter. He and I came up with a >> proposed paragraph to add after that list of bullet points: >> >> In the initial phase of work on HTTP/2.0, new proposals >> for authentication schemes can be made. The WG will >> select zero or more of those with a goal of choosing >> at least one scheme that is better than those available >> for HTTP/1.x. Non-selected schemes might be discussed >> with the IETF Security Area for further work there. > > If the WG selects zero, how can it meet the goal of choosing at least one > scheme?
It doesn't, of course. If the WG doesn't meet that goal, it will be clear at the time, and the WG can ask to recharter for that limited purpose. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
