On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Congestion Exposure WG (conex) >> to consider the following document: >> - 'ConEx Concepts and Use Cases' >> <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> as an Informational RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-04-12. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This document provides the entry point to the set of documentation >> about the Congestion Exposure (ConEx) protocol. It explains the >> motivation for including a ConEx marking at the IP layer: to expose >> information about congestion to network nodes. Although such >> information may have a number of uses, this document focuses on how >> the information communicated by the ConEx marking can serve as the >> basis for significantly more efficient and effective traffic >> management than what exists on the Internet today. >> >> >> >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ballot/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > Didn't Mr Briscoe just email that there was a BT IPR claim against > this ID, related to re-ECN work he did/does for BT?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/current/msg00916.html
