David: The list of participants and their addresses are already part of the proceedings. The incremental difference shows which participants signed in at each session.
Russ On May 6, 2012, at 7:03 PM, David Morris wrote: > > From my following of the topic, that concensus was really rough, in > particular the part about publishing the scans on-line. That represents > a significant difference in ease access which I think required more than > the very very rough concensus you seem to think you found. > > On Sun, 6 May 2012, IETF Chair wrote: > >> We have heard from many community participants, and consensus is quite rough >> on this topic. The IESG discussed this thread and reached two conclusions: >> >> (1) Rough consensus: an open and transparent standards process is more >> important to the IETF than privacy of blue sheet information. >> >> (2) Rough consensus: inclusion of email addresses is a good way to >> distinguish participants with the same or similar names. >> >> >> Based on these conclusions, the plan is to handle blue sheets as follows: >> >> - Continue to collect email addresses on blue sheets; >> >> - Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for the WG >> session; >> >> - Add indication to top of the blue sheet so people know it will be part of >> the proceedings; and >> >> - Discard paper blue sheets after scanning. >> >> >> On behalf of the IESG, >> Russ >> >> >
