On 6/15/12 3:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> One possible oversight is that this I-D does not describe how the editor >> will work on the tao-possible-revision.html file (e.g., will only the >> editor have permissions to work on that, might there be multiple >> committers, will it be under source control?). Are such details >> intentionally out of scope? > > > I would imagine that that would be determined by the IESG when they pick a > Tao editor.
Fine with me. I'm not even saying this I-D needs to say it's out of scope, I merely curious. /psa
