> The abstract mentions 'many people', because many people may mean 4 to 10 > people. The annonced I-D lacks the method of discussion in the community > (discussing such change), the draft mentions the input from any community > individual to be accepted by editor and then approved by IESG, but does not > mention the methodology of discussion between community members nor > between editor and members, also no announcements of such updates > mentioned in draft.
On this, as well as on the rest of the comments in the same message: The IETF already has a process for discussion, review, and consensus, and this document neither changes any of it nor, I think, needs to repeat it. Barry
