On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:59:43 -0700 SM <s...@resistor.net> wrote: > >Also, this statement in 8.3 is not really true and probably better left out: > > > >"Proxies using this extension will preserve the information of a > > direct connection, which has an end-user privacy impact, if the end- > > user or deployer does not know or expect that this is the case." > > I suggest removing that statement. The wording is not entirely > clear. I read it as diluting end-user privacy impact.
I interpret it the other way around. It makes a deployer aware that there is also end user expectations to take into considerations. Removing it may work as well, but I think that less well reflects the discussion on the apps-list. > In Section 6.3: > > 'To distinguish the obfuscated identifier from other identifiers, > it MUST have a leading underscore "_".' > > I suggest removing the requirement and using "can". The implementer > can decide what to put in that field. I think that will make parsing harder, and give no benefit at all. Cheers, Andreas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
