2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents should not be published as RFCs - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work in this area
Scott On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust > we will not be discussing this draft, or > draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 30/07/2012 09:26, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> >> >> Title : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for >> L3 VPNs >> Author(s) : Shankar Raman >> Balaji Venkat Venkataswami >> Gaurav Raina >> Vasan Srini >> Bhargav Bhikkaji >> Filename : >> draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt >> Pages : 12 >> Date : 2012-07-30 >> >> Abstract: >> In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label >> Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful >> Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN >> models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned >> methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to >> provision from one single point. More particularly the auto- >> provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling >> between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the >> appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple >> instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in >> the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN >> case. >> >> this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined >> labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning >> lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels >> both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single >> point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted >> traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs >> participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect >> provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful >> Intercept mechanism is also outlined. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00 >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce mailing list >> i-d-annou...@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>
