> On 03/08/2012, at 8:09 PM, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:

> >> Very much; when it becomes a "document" (e.g., mixed markup), XML is a much
> >> better choice.
> >
> > The other interesting case is where large amounts of data arrive in a 
> > stream.
> > SAX and SAX-like libraries makes this easy to implement with XML. I hope
> > there's an equivalent for Json; if not there needs to be.

> Funny you mention that, I was just looking into that yesterday.

> This seems to be in the front running:
>   http://lloyd.github.com/yajl/

This looks promising. Thanks for the pointer.

                                Ned



Reply via email to